About Me

Name:Green Faerie
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Blog Roll

 

O Ye Suckers!

Back in the early '90s, I started listening to G. Gordon Liddy's radio show which was then called Radio Free D.C..  It provided hours of entertainment as Liddy intelligently skewered everything Bill 'n Hill tried to foist upon the American public, particularly during the dark years of 1993-1995 when we had a left wing Congress.  Whenever the Dems cooked up some scheme like Hillarycare and drag queens in the military, Liddy would intone to the voters who put them there, "O ye suckers!"

That phrase bears repeating as the Dems rub their hands in anticipation of all the nutty things they've fantasized about pushing on us since 1994.  If the voters wanted "change" (as in, all you'll have left of your paycheck is "change" if the Dems get their way), they're in for a nasty surprise.  Already they're planning for Impeachment II:  Electric Boogaloo, turning tail from Iraq, bringing back Hillarycare, and now Charlie Rangel wants to bring back the draft.  Rep. John Conyers wants to push through a bill that would essentially make it illegal to criticize Islam.  I can hardly wait until they come up with another push for "slave reparations." 

In all likelihood, most of the worst of these won't pass.  The Dems don't have that big of a majority and hopefully President Bush has finally found that veto stamp he'd been missing for a while.  The last people who want a draft are...the military.  It takes valuable time and resources to do things like shoot cowards, which they'll have to do if they have loads of people who really don't want to be there (or shouldn't be there).  Canada has made it clear it doesn't want any more gringos trying to escape a war.  

Hey, maybe if we drafted illegal immigrants...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The horror, the horror

 Like most of you reading this, I'm disappointed and heartbroken, especially since we lost a lot of white hats in the process.  But we can't really say the election last night was a surprise either.  Dick Morris has been saying it was going to happen and this time he was right.  Last month, even Ann Coulter predicted this was going to be the Dems' 1994. 

You can certainly grumble about the news media's daily carnage reports from Iraq and it looks like media hype about a possible Dem takeover helped motivate their voters.  But this was generally a case of the GOP blowing off its foot with a 12-gauge shotgun...the Dems won mostly by default.  Unmotivated conservatives stayed home and independents decided to change from All to Tide because they're bored/annoyed with Congress.  The GOP let itself breathe in the Potomac swamp gas and spend like Michael Jackson on a Vegas spree.  It got wobbly when it came to other bread 'n butter issues its base cares about.  Scandals eroded trust.  Unpopular local policies screwed Republicans over in Indiana.  There was a failure by the party on a national level to emphasize the GOP's successes, and to get the people engaged Iraq/the war on terror.  Bush seems to have retreated since winning re-election, as though the constant dogging got to him.  You know you're in trouble when folks like Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham are criticizing you about as often as they are cheerleading for you.  One thing's for sure, liberals always hold their noses and vote for the lesser evil if they're not inspired.  Unmotivated conservatives just stay home.

We'll have to wait and see if we're going to get a Rosie O'Donnell Congress or a Kirsten Powers one (it's too much to hope for Zell Miller).  Even though the Dems successfully ran moderate to conservative candidates in several places, and even though we're hearing the requisite calls for "bipartisanship," I think the hard-left wing of the party just can't help itself.  We may have some DINOs in there now but it's the moonbats holding the gavels, to paraphrase I post I read on Little Green Footballs.

But the most disturbing aspect of the elections is what it reveals about American voters as a whole.  Five years after 9/11, America hasn't wrapped its head around what we're facing from Islamofascists and their radical left useful idiots.  It hasn't wrapped its head around the illegal immigration issue either.  And it's scary to think of what it'll take for those things to happen.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Explaining the SP mentality

 I finished reading Bill O'Reilly's latest book, "Culture Warrior," a couple of weeks ago.  Whatever you might think of Bill O, it was actually pretty good.  He explains in simple terms what's really at stake in the U.S. of A. politically and socially.  He narrows it down the culture war to traditionalists who view America and its traditions as forces of good in the world, versus the "secular progressives" who think that America is at best deeply-flawed and at worst, an evil empire, and believe its traditions get in the way of changing that.  He offers a dossier on the leaders of the SP movement, a Cliffs Notes of David Horowitz's Discover the Network site.

What the book doesn't do though is explain why anyone would want hop on the SP bus and why the SPs regard traditionalists with great love and affection...not.  Bill O admits the shrill hatred the SPs has for traditionalists (whether they are liberal or conservative) outmatches any "bomb-throwing" from the traditionalist side.  But I'll explain the hows and whys in a couple of short paragraphs, based on years of "field research," i.e. knowing many liberals and even some far lefties.

Secular progressivism appeals the most to those who feel like outsiders or misfits.  No matter how fair, just, and prosperous America may be compared to most if not all other nations on Earth, there are always going to be those who believe they just don't fit in.  Whether it's an atheist who grew up in a Bible Belt town or a guy whose American dream didn't come true or a feminist who feels men have screwed her over, it's easy for an outsider to blame the culture or society as a whole and wants the society to change so that he or she can feel included.  Secular progressivism also appeals to those who cling to an affectation of being an outsider.  These folks are adolescent in their worldview, always rebelling against the "status quo" just for the sake of being a cool non-conformist.  I think a good chunk of SP entertainers fall into this category.  Secular progressivism appeals as well to those souls who think empathizing or sympathizing with the outsider or misfit is some sort of virtue unto itself.  White Liberal Guilt is often a sympthom of these kinds of SPs.  They are isolated from the effects of SP policies or are too naive to realize how those policies, if they are ever enacted, would adversely affect them.  (Some of these SPs aren't so much well-meaning-yet-misguided folks; some are vain types who are just trying to feel good about themselves.)  Again, many SP entertainers and many SPs in the media fall into this category.  And I will acknowledge there are SPs who grew up with these types of politics, passed down from their parents and grandparents.

There are two reasons why SPs loathe traditionalists and American traditional institutions (Christianity, the military, marriage, etc.).  The first reason is obvious...traditionalists stand in the way of the SPs' goals of remaking society in their own image.  There's nothing more irritating to would-be/wanna-be revolutionaries than the obstacles that get in the way of their agenda.  The second reason is that traditionalists represent everything that make SPs feel like outsiders (or make others feel like outsiders) in the first place.  It's the same hatred the unpopular kids have for the cheerleaders and jocks.

Bear in mind, all most SPs want is to not feel like outsiders anymore by eliminating or diluting the institutions they feel ostracize them in the first place.  The SPs that really scare me are the ones who want to go one step further and make the traditionalists (that's you and me) the ones who are the outsiders.  Or eliminate them completely.  Considering most Americans are traditionalist to some degree and the types of leaders these SPs idolize (Mao, Stalin, Castro), it would do us well to keep a wary eye on them.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Shoppers With A Cause

 When most of us go to the store, we look for stuff that we need or stuff that we want.  Either way, we take many things into consideration:  quality, price, brand (if we have a favorite).  Especially price.  Americans love to save a buck or two, especially when we have bills to pay, kids to support, and taxes to pay to the Man.

However, for the limo lib crowd, it's all about feeling good about themselves.  Step into any Whole Foods in America for instance.  I like Whole Foods, even though I prefer its cheaper and less pretentious rival Trader Joe's.  But even this conservative chickie likes exotic cheeses, soda brands you don't find elsewhere, and organic super dark chocolate.  Anyway, I've noticed an awful lot of the wares there not only brag about being healthy and organic, but also about being recyclable, fair trade, and so forth.  There's a tea I bought that was organic, fair trade, and there's all of this mumbo jumbo about nourishing the global tribe and stuff.  It's nice the folks picking the tea get paid more than a penny an hour and get good benefits.  But I was primarily concerned with a) the tea was raspberry earl grey with bergamot...yum and b) the cannister was quite pretty.  The price was not too bad.  I'll shell out more for quality product because now I can afford to.  I know a lot of the feel goodism out there is marketing for liberals who want to pat themselves on the back for indulging in luxury goods with the excuse that it's good for society and the planet.

This is the same mentality at work behind a lot of the relatively pricey products launched by the Project Red campaign, where you can get stuff made by Apple, Converse, The Gap, etc. to help raise money to fight AIDS in Africa.  On paper there's nothing wrong with selling products to raise money for disease research.  Avon has done this for years to raise money for breast cancer research.  But as Michael Medved pointed out on his blog and on his radio show, a lot of the items are more expensive than the companies' regular products.  I think a $60 hoodie from The Gap is out of reach for a lot of college students.  There's a pair of $150 jeans on sale, and while they are made of highest-quality Japanese denim, it's as pointless as selling Beluga caviar.  Why not just sell $20 t-shirts or $48 jeans?  You'd get more sales (and ostensibly more $ for the cause), no?  How about some reassurance the money raised by this drive will actually go to help people and not end up wasted, in some dictator's pocket, or going to things buyers wouldn't agree with if they knew about it?  How much was spent on advertising and promotion?

The problem I have with feel good consumerism is how it encourages an attitude that if you don't spend more for fair trade or if you aren't willing to blow $40 on a t-shirt for a politically-correct charity drive, it's because you're mean and you don't care.  It's slactivism served with a big dollop of smug elitism.  How about making more of this supposedly beneficial stuff affordable to those of us with thinner bank accounts?  Trader Joe's has made organic stuff affordable and now WalMart is in the organic business.  No wonder libs hate WalMart...they make the chic so common.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Keep Your Laws Off My Plate!

I find it comical that many of the same people who will fight to the bitter end for the right to kill babies indiscriminately or to engage in meritricious relations with a goat in the name of "freedom" and "keeping the government out of our lives" support intrusive laws in the name of keeping us healthy or to help out the poor critters.

The Supernanny Chicago city council recently banned restaurants from serving foie gras (goose liver) because the animal rights groups managed to convince the pols that making geese fat through forced feeding was too mean to the poor animals.  Frankly, it's not any more cruel than slaughtering chickens for a KFC bucket.  But since foie gras is fancy food, not what Joe Sixpack eats all of the time, the council got away with it.  I hope Chicago restaurants say "stuff it" to the council and keep serving foie gras.  I also certainly hope the people of Chicago realize that it might be a delicacy one day, the famous cheeseburga, cheeseburga tomorrow.  The animal rights crowd doesn't want kinder, gentler ways of bringing a juicy steak to your dinner table.  It wants you eating soy and tofu instead.  If it can make the Chicago pols to see reason in banning or restricting meat and fish sales, it's going to do it.

Meanwhile in Gotham, the Busybodies believe they have the civic duty to make sure you don't ingest any trans fats.  It wants to force every restaurant in NYC to drop trans fats from its fare.  Yes, we know trans fats are bad and can help clog up arteries.  But everyone ordering french fries or a doughnut knows they are not getting health food.  It's not the government's problem to ensure I'm eating my vegetables and keeping my cholesterol low.  We cannot and should not want government to micromanage our meals.  To do so is to invite tyranny.  For if the government can control my dinner, it can pretty much control everything else.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

In Eeyore Mode

I don't know about you guys, but I am not optimistic on the WOT.  Is it because of the mayhem in the Middle East?  Not exactly. 

It's because as a country, heck, as Western Civilization, we just don't have the cahonies to engage Islamofascism (and it's growing alliance with the radical left) and defeat it.  Right after 9/11, I told someone the thing that worried me is that America has become too soft, too fat, and too lazy to have the fighting spirit and determination to fight a long-term conflict.  The enemy certainly does; they think they're on a mission from Allah.  We here in the U.S. of A. and especially in Europe and Canada think we just need to give these folks a hug and all will go well.  We just want the problem to be solved in 30 minutes like a sitcom.  We don't want to have to change our lives and our routines.  We don't want to have to make sacrifices.  We've had it too good for too long.

A difficult life on the frontier and on the farm shaped the folks who fought in the American Revolution, the Civil War, and WWI.  WWI, the Spanish Flu epidemic of 1918, and the Depression shaped the "Greatest Generation."  What shaped the Baby Boomers, GenX, GenY, and the kids playing with Bratz dolls and Grand Theft Auto?  See what I mean?  Even the Cold War was won without a direct conflict with the Soviets.  We have no concept of what our forebears faced even a century ago.  We're too detached from that.

Worst of all, the elites in Western society are completely against conflict with Islamofascism.  How can you mobilize the public if academia, a significant portion of our political leadership, the press, and even popular culture are constantly beating the drum of appeasement and retreat?  Rush Limbaugh and a couple of good speeches from President Bush aren't going to do it.  Because of moral relativism, the left clinging to the devil it knows rather than confront the real monster underneath the bed, and a lack of interest/education on Western culture and values, our elites just don't care. 

So, unless someone figures out a way to resurrect Charles Martel, Queen Isabel, and Winston Churchill, I think things are going to get a whole lot worse.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

My 9/11/01 Story

 I used to live in the Washington, D.C. area and on the morning of September 11, 2001 I arrived at work in Rosslyn, VA which is just across the river from D.C. and about 3-4 miles from the Pentagon. It was a very clear day, with deep blue cloudless skies. There was nothing unusual about the day except for my feeling a bit nervous and irritable for a few days beforehand. But I thought nothing of it. I had just gotten my cup of tea and was looking at TheForce.Net's article about all of the stuff on the upcoming Phantom Menace DVD when a co-worker came up to the area where I was sitting and said, "A plane crashed into the World Trade Center." He'd just heard it on the radio. My impression was of a small Cessna or something making a wrong turn into the building. I tried to get on various news site pages online to get more information but either I couldn't get on them due to heavy traffic or the details were sketchy.

A woman sitting across from me was listening to the breaking reports on her radio. She said that it wasn't a little plane, it was a jet liner, a 757. My jaw dropped. I knew there would be a massive loss of life with a crash of that magnitude. But I believed it was an accident. Until another jet liner hit the other tower a short time later.

By this time everyone in the office with a radio was listening to the news accounts of the horrors in New York. Then we heard sirens outside (as it turned out, some were fire trucks heading for the nearby Gannett building). A few moments later we found out a jet liner crashed into the Pentagon. I went outside to look and all I could see was billowing black smoke coming from the direction of the Pentagon. Before long F-15s from the District National Guard were in the air guarding the skies.

I went back inside to learn one tower had collapsed. I continued to listen to the radio account of people jumping out of the only standing tower as well as news about the crash at the Pentagon. By this time I was starting to get worried that there were more surprise attacks in store and that the subway system I took to work was going to be shut down. When there were reports of a plane heading off-course toward D.C., one of our managers hastily called a meeting and told everyone they could go home. I called my mom at her job and told her to come pick me up at a nearby Marriott. The street in front of my building was also in front of the subway stop and I figured it would be mobbed. As I was getting ready to go, I heard about the second tower collapsing. I'll never forget as I was walking out the door, the receptionist had her radio set on an R&B station and there was a preacher on the air saying something like, "Lord heal this city! Lord heal this land!"

Walking over to the hotel was a surreal experience because it was so still and so quiet. There were people everywhere trying to get home but there wasn't a lot of noise. I got to the Marriott and by this time I'd learned the plane heading for D.C. had crashed in Pennsylvania. Worried tourists were trying to get cabs to the airport but I knew those folks weren't going anywhere. I just sat on a bench outside and waited, talking to people and watching crowds walking across the Key Bridge from D.C. into Rosslyn. The streets in D.C. were closed and part of the subway was closed.

I went inside once to use the restroom and I saw people in a ballroom that apparently came for a conference sitting around watching television instead. The bar was completely packed with people glued to the t.v. there.

If there was anything positive at all about that day was the amazing kindness by strangers. Several people offered to give me rides home, knowing the road and subway situation. They offered to go several miles out of their way. Given that my mom was enroute and it would be difficult now to reach her by cell phone (everyone was using their phones), I couldn't just take off with anyone. I didn't want to give her a heart attack if she shows up and there's no one there.

But I waited and waited. The bellhop's phone rings. He answers it, looks at me, and asks, "Are you (my name)?" Let me tell you that really freaked me out. "Yes," I said warily. The bellhop says, "Your mother is on the phone." My mom was calling from a restaurant some miles away, explaining that she called the front desk and gave them a description. It must have been a pretty good one because the front desk people recognized me through the front window and rang through to the bellhop. My mom could not drive into Rosslyn because the authorities had closed the roads going into that area. She told me she'd heard the subway had reopened. So I hiked on back to the station and took the train. It was real quiet on that trip back and nobody could look anyone else in the eye. I was nervous as heck that something would happen. I just wanted to get home, board it up, and cradle a shotgun in my lap.

I turned on the t.v. and just watched the carnage again and again. I was touched to see the outpouring of grief from around the world but infuriated to see some dancing in the streets. I was proud of the great heroism shown by the passengers of the downed plane in Pennsylvania. Phone calls came in from people I know in other states and other countries to see if I was okay. Of course I wasn't in the Pentagon or anything and neither were any family or friends. But the fear and uncertainty, the shock, the emotional rollercoaster of going from frightened to sad to outraged was at times overwhelming. For the first time I could truly empathize with the British back in the IRA's heyday or what Israelis have to endure all of the time. I got this horrible headache that wouldn't go away for three days and I had a hard time sleeping. Moody, irritable, you name it. That was me.

If that wasn't enough, D.C. got hit with the anthrax letters. I had to do some work downtown D.C. about a month later--right across the street from the U.S. Holocaust Museum!--just as all of that was happening. You could have sent me into a panic attack by leaving a pile of Sweet and Low on my desk. It was a very bizarre and terrifying time. For days after the attacks I found myself calling and e-mailing my friends more and listening to a lot old music I liked when I was younger. It was the only way I could ground myself.

Things settled back to something like normal over the subsequent months. I say that because once something happens to your community on that scale it never goes back to normal. Every time I flew out of Dulles airport I couldn't help but think of AA Flight 77. I became more nervous taking the subway than I had any time before Sept. 11. When those trains in Madrid were bombed back in March, I continued to take the subway but boy was I a quivering wreck inside. You cannot avoid the feeling at the back of your mind that simply living and working in the vicinity of the nation's capitol puts a big old target on your back. I admit today that I'm relieved I don't live there anymore. As far as I'm concerned anywhere in America is a potential target for terrorism but D.C. is at or near the top. Simple fact of life.

As for New York, I'd visited a few times since Sept. 11 (most recently in April) but I could not bring myself to go to Ground Zero. It's too unnerving for me. My last visit before the terror attacks was in December 2000 and I went again in July 2002. It was very, very odd to not see the World Trade Center's towers in the far distance, letting you know you were almost there. It was odd to see nothing towering above Chinatown and lower Manhattan the way the towers once did. It's creepy to think a building complex I'd visited in 1984 was simply no longer there.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Free Speech? What's That?

ABC has found itself in a battle royale with the Clintonistas and the DNC over the upcoming miniseries "The Path To 9-11."  Many of us on the right are not happy that ABC has chosen to make edits in order to appease the critics, although there have been a few who concur that scenes that made certain people look bad due to "fictionalization" and "creative license" were rightfully edited and changed.  Okay, I guess if it's a specific issue of not making Madeleine Albright look like Osama bin Laden's champion, that's fair.  Although the mistakes made by the Clinton administration in dealing with terrorism are legion, we don't get anywhere by making up those mistakes in a movie. 

But no edit should ever have been made to appease the vanity of former President Clinton and the obsessive need to "protect" his "legacy."  This is bad enough.  Going as far as to demand that ABC pull the show completely and make veiled threats to pull its broadcasting license ought to scare the you-know-what out of every American who truly values free speech.  The DNC has been there before.  The Kerry campaign issued similar threats against Sinclair Broadcasting, which planned to air a show quite uncomplimentary to the candidate.  (Compare that to the lack of threats issued to NBC for its constant pimping of lie-fest "Fahrenheit 9-11" or to CBS for Memogate, even with Republicans in charge of the legislative and executive branches.)

It ought to tell you the ugly path the Dems plan to take should they win back Congress in either 2006 or 2008, and if Empress Hillary enters the White House.  A few nights ago on Hannity & Colmes, Bob Beckel laughed off the idea of a Democratic House or Senate trying to impeach President Bush.  He doesn't know his own party very well, do he?  Just yesterday, they shot down a Democratic proposal for a "no confidence" vote in Donald Rumsfeld.  They're just warming up.  And it won't stop there.  The Dems will find a way to pull the plug on Fox News.  They will bring back the Fairness Doctrine and use "election reform" laws to put Rush, Sean, Savage, and all of the rest of the talk show hosts off the air.  They'll come after the blogs.  Sprinkle the magic pixie dust of "fairness," "civility" and "stopping hate speech" and they'll get away with it.  It's what their far left sugar daddies and netroot supporters expect of them.

Sit home in November?  You better not if you value free speech.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Look at meeeee! I'm a liberal!!!!1!!!11!

One of the most significant differences between a liberal and a conservative isn't what you would think.  It's not on policy issues or social issues or any of that.  The true Great Divide is in how liberals can't help but wear their progressiveness on their sleeves.  Really!  This is one reason why those Hollywood limousine libs just can't shut up; their non-famous counterparts also think anytime, anywhere, and any place is a good opportunity to beat everyone over their heads with politics.

It's true.  If you work with, date, or even just sit next to a liberal for more than five minutes, you will know he is a liberal within that short span of time.  You can know a conservative for months or even years before you realize you've met an ideological soul mate. 

For instance, I can point out to you all 26 local listeners of Air America because they all have AA bumper stickers placed prominently on their Volvos and hybrids.  I haven't seen a single "I Love Sean" and very rarely see a "Rush Is Right" sticker, yet they are the top two talkers on the air.  You don't see nearly as many pro-Bush stickers as you do "Kerry/Edwards" stickers stuck on reality-challenged liberal cars.  In fact, I knew a girl in college who still had a Mondale/Ferraro sticker on her car.  Eeeek!

In fact, liberals prefer covering their vehicles with bumper stickers far more than conservatives do.  Even if you're just sitting in traffic, they want you to know that they are against fur, pro-abortion, and think Bush is an idiot.  Zzzz.

On the internet, you can go on any non-political message board and find liberals more than happy to somehow turn any discussion into some sort of Bush bashing/anti-Republican session.  They also use icons and signature lines to spread their message, rubbing their BDS in your face.

And that's not all.  They'll debate you at work.  At family functions.  Wherever.  There's no such thing as "the wrong time" to let you know about their politics.  Worst of all, they automatically assume that you agree with them!

Conservatives generally understand there's a time and place for everything and not everybody wants a debate all of the time.  I also admit that sticking up for conservative ideas will almost always stimulate a liberal's wrath.  Conservatives are happy to have a fair debate.  Libs just want to yell, scream, flame, and call you names.

No wonder we were once called The Silent Majority.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mel Hell

Everybody's heard about Mel Gibson's freakout last weekend and everybody has an opinion. Here's mine. I'd been a fan of his for several years, going back to the time I rented "Gallipoli" back in 1983. "Braveheart" remains one of my favorite films. I was glad "The Passion of the Christ" was successful because of all of the attempts to tear it down, largely by secularists and by some Jewish leaders worried it was going to start a wave of pogroms, which it didn't. Gibson also managed to pull off something that hadn't been done in a thousand years, and that was to bring Christians of every denomination together. But I'm also aware Gibson has a dark side he's battled for a long time: chicks, booze, anger, arrogance, and a persecution complex. I think what happened with "The Passion" overwhelmed him. Of course I'm not excusing his behavior. I'm terribly disappointed with his behavior not because I expect him to be a saint, but because I expected better from a guy who at age 50 SHOULD know better. Who knows if he's a lifelong anti-Semite or not? In any case, he has apologized at least twice and I hope he will lay off the sauce and to purge the anti-Semitism from his heart. Medved feels betrayed and I don't blame him. In any case, some wonder if Mel is washed up in Tinseltown. He has enough money to fund his own projects for the rest of his life and I think if he behaves, he will win back the respect of his fans. There are those who want Mel shunned, including a superagent who counts among his clients Israel-hating creep Michael Moore. Mel isn't the first celebrity to spout anti-Semitic comments either. What about Michael Jackson's line "jew me" from one of his songs from 15 years ago? Nobody minded that too much, except for the late film producer Dawn Steel. A stone-cold sober Vanessa Redgrave spouted her anti-Israel, pro-PLO blather at an Academy Awards acceptance speech back in the '70s (incidentally, some biographies mention her father was rabidly anti-Semitic). Marlon Brando once made some offensive comments while on Larry King's show several years ago (he must not have known much about King). Brando worked almost until the end of his weird life and while Redgrave never won an Oscar again, she's worked steadily over the years. I find it sad that partially because we have a celebrity crazed culture and partially because the MSM has wanted to stick it to Mel for "The Passion"'s success, we heard more about this case than about another anti-Semite who killed one poor woman and injured four in Seattle. And we have people more outraged about a single boozed up actor's rant than about thousands of anti-Semites lobbing scores of missiles into a whole country filled with Jews.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Conservative At Comic Con

Promoted as the biggest pop cultural fest in the world, Comic Con International is a big deal to comics geeks, Trek fans, Star Wars fans, t.v. fans, movie fans, video game fans, etc..  Over a hundred thousand people descended upon San Diego, CA last week for four days of craziness.  Last weekend was the third Comic Con I've attended and it seems like it gets more popular every time.  It's like you have three big holidays:  Christmas, Easter, and Comic Con, or just "con" as the cool people like to call it.  There are many things I enjoy about Comic Con.  For one thing, it's the one time where Hollywood comes to suck up to the people instead of Hollywood expecting the reverse.  The big stars who come to promote their movies don't get a green room and a gift bag worth thousands of dollars.  They actually have to respond to requests for hugs and even put up with criticism.  Another thing I enjoy about it is people can relax and be themselves and not quite feel so out-of-place for having an obsession with something.  Wearing costumes is encouraged.  Die-hard collectors can find just about anything they're looking for, whether it's a new convention exclusive or a rare Golden Age comic book.  It's exhausting fun. Of course, there are massive crowds and some of my fellow geeks can be hygenically challenged.  Standing in lines for exclusives or to pack into a room for a presentation can be a drag.  But for a conservative, Comic Con presents some insights about what the entertainment industry and an "edge"-obsessed culture is attempting to dump on us, especially on the youth. I'm not that easily offended.  After 14 years of going to cons and comic book shops, I'm aware there's plenty of material that's not friendly toward Christianity or anything traditional for that matter.  There are booths with Playboy models and there's sexually-explicit material for sale.  I'm also aware the industry is full of liberals and far-leftists, as are many of the fans who come to these things.  I recall in 2004, MoveOn.org was trying to register voters (presumably not Republican voters) outside of the convention center. There was a booth selling t-shirts and stickers with "Republicans For Voldemort" on them but alas, no "Democrats For Dolores" for sale (Harry Potter reference). Nevertheless there were things that I saw and heard this year that disturbed me.  I saw a few young men going around with black cloth masks wrapped around their faces and heads, exposing only their eyes.  Were they supposed to be ninjas?  I don't know, but they looked to me more the sort of things jihadists or anarchist black block types wear.  Their ignorance disturbed and irritated me.  How many Comic Cons has Osama bin Laden sponsored?  And what's so heroic about a bunch of wimpy cowards who trash Starbucks?  I went and sat through a few panels put on by movie studios to promote their upcoming projects while waiting for the panel I really wanted to see (you have to get there early for a good seat).  Fox did a promo for a comedy called Borat and showed a clip of two male characters wrestling in the nude and getting into all kinds of positions.  There were profanities in the clip as well.  This scene was disturbing enough for me to turn away from it, which was bad enough.  But the worst thing is there were children in the audience.  This was R, if not NC-17, rated material and there was no warning the clip was unsuitable for kids or anything.   Earlier, there was violence and gore in a clip of a film called Pathfinder.  A little bit later on during Universal's slot, there was a short appearance by the cast and producer of a comedy called Accepted.  The producer said "shut the (f-bomb) up" repeatedly and a cast member said it once.  Again, there were kids in the audience. Not everything at Comic Con is unsuitable for kids.  In fact every Sunday during the con is kids' day and they have promoted family-friendly movies like Narnia, Lord Of The Rings, or Star Wars.  But the callous disregard for whether material's appropriate for a general audience was disturbing.  It goes to show you what kind of people run the entertainment business and it shows you they'll cheerfully dish out filth and violence on the small fry any day of the week.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Madrid, London, Mumbai...is your town next?

Yet again, a subway system is attacked by, in all likelihood, Islamowacko terrorists and scores of innocent people are maimed and killed.

How many times does this have to happen until folks in the West wake the hell up and realize what's going on?  India has had decades of sectarian and ethnic violence but this particular incident--regardless if it's by al Qaeda or homegrown Kashmiri separatists or some other group--follows a pattern set over the past three years.  March 11, 2003:  a series of explosions on different trains near Madrid's Atocha rail station.  July 7, 2005:  a series of explosions on different trains on London's Underground and on a double decker bus.  Today:  seven or eight explosions on different trains on Moombai.  I think all of the attacks occurred during rush hour...morning rush hour in Madrid and London, evening rush hour in Mumbai.

A big September 11-style attack can certainly happen again but it's clear to me the enemy is targeting subways.  This means that the L in Chicago, BART in San Francisco, the Metro in Washington, D.C. or Boston, or New York's famous subway could very well be next.  Already we know about a plot to use toxic gas in New York.

But nooooo...security is abysmal and our media is more interested in sticking it to the Bush administration to care.

My condolensces to everyone injured and those who lost loved ones today.  We're all Indians today.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123Next »